ZoomInfo alternatives for small business with prices you can see: Apollo, Hunter, Snov.io, Lusha and UpLead compared on credits, free plans and trials.
•5 min read•Sales Prospecting & Outreach
Verdict:For a small team, Apollo.io is the first one to try because it has a free plan with no time limit and adds outreach. Hunter, Snov.io, Lusha and UpLead publish prices that ZoomInfo does not.
| Tool | Price | Platforms | Best for | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo.io | Free plan with no time limit; paid prices not shown as figures on the pricing page | Web browser | A small team that wants contact data and email sequences in one tool, starting free | Docs only |
| Hunter | Free (50 credits a month); Starter $49 monthly or $34 a month billed yearly | Web browser | Finding and sending to email addresses with unlimited team members, even on the free plan | Docs only |
| Snov.io | Free trial plan (50 credits); Starter $39 monthly or $29.25 a month billed annually | Web browser | A small outbound team that wants email finding and sending recipients at the lowest listed paid price | Docs only |
| Lusha | Free (40 credits a month); Starter $49.90 monthly or $37.45 a month billed annually | Web browser | Reps who look up single contacts and want a free plan to start | Docs only |
| UpLead | 7-day trial with 5 credits; Essentials $99 monthly or $74 a month billed annually | Web browser | Buyers who want a published price and a trial before paying, and can live without a free plan | Docs only |
Independent comparison. Paid placements are labelled separately; editorial links earn no affiliate commissions. Learn more.
If ZoomInfo's quote is more than a small team can justify, start with Apollo.io: its pricing page describes a free plan with no time limit. Compare it against Hunter, Snov.io, Lusha and UpLead, which show dollar prices on their own pages. ZoomInfo does not. The deciding factor is whether you use ZoomInfo for contact lookups or for intent data: the cheaper tools below are lookup and outreach tools, and none lists intent topics.
Five criteria decide this for a team of one to ten:
ZoomInfo is built around packages and sales-mediated terms. Its pricing page says the sales team works out payment frequency and options with you, and that Professional and the Copilot plans offer a free trial while Marketing Demand and the ABM packages offer a demo. A small team usually cannot compare plans before that conversation.
Apollo.io is a web-based sales platform. According to Apollo's pricing page, the Free plan is for light usage and has no time limit, and paid plans are Basic, Professional and Custom.
Two limits matter to a small team. Apollo's page says free-plan email campaigns can connect only Gmail accounts, while paid plans also allow Microsoft Office and other providers. It also says credits are pooled across the team and expire at the end of the billing cycle, with no rollover. Apollo does not publish dollar figures for its paid plans on that page, so ask for the current price in the app before budgeting.
To move over, export your ZoomInfo target list, then run it through Apollo's free plan and see how many contacts it finds. Apollo may not suit a team that needs deep intent topics, since its pricing page lists no intent topics. For more options in this space, see Apollo.io alternatives.
Hunter is a web-based email finder and outreach tool. According to Hunter's pricing page, the Free plan gives 50 credits a month, one connected email account and 500 recipients per sequence, and it includes unlimited team members. That makes it one of the easiest ways to test a prospect list as a team without paying.
Paid plans are priced openly. Starter is $49 a month, or $34 a month billed yearly, with 2,000 credits a month and three connected email accounts. Growth is $149 monthly or $104 a month billed yearly, with 10,000 credits. The page also says credits reset monthly and do not roll over, so unused credits in a quiet month are lost.
Hunter is built around email addresses, so a team that depends on direct dials should test Lusha or Apollo alongside it. More in Hunter alternatives and our guide to a free email finder.
Snov.io is a web-based sales suite that finds emails and sends sequences. Its pricing page lists a Trial plan with 50 credits and 100 recipients that renews every 30 days. The page says the Trial plan leaves out integrations, bulk search, bulk verification and export, so it is a way to try the interface, not to run a campaign.
Starter costs $39 a month, or $29.25 a month on annual billing, and includes 1,000 credits and 5,000 recipients. Pro S costs $99 monthly, or $74.25 a month annually, with 5,000 credits and 25,000 recipients. Those are the lowest listed paid prices in this comparison.
Snov.io suits a small outbound team that wants finding and sending in one place on a tight budget. If you need a large phone-number database, test Lusha or Apollo first.
Lusha is a web-based contact lookup tool. According to Lusha's pricing page, the Free plan includes 40 credits a month. Starter costs $49.90 monthly or $37.45 a month on annual billing for 400 credits a month. Pro costs $69.90 monthly or $52.45 on annual billing for 600 credits.
Lusha also lists a Premium plan at $399.90 monthly, or $299.95 a month billed annually, with 3,400 credits a month. The price jump from Pro to Premium is steep, so a team that outgrows Pro should compare Apollo and UpLead before upgrading.
Lusha fits reps who look up one contact at a time while browsing, and who want a free plan before committing. For comparisons, see Lusha alternatives.
UpLead is a web-based B2B contact database. Its pricing page lists a 7-day free trial with 5 credits. There is no free plan, but the trial lets you check results before paying.
Essentials is $99 a month monthly with 170 credits, or $74 a month billed annually with 2,040 credits. Plus is $199 monthly with 400 credits, or $149 a month billed annually with 4,800 credits. Professional is annual billing only and quoted on request.
Read the monthly and annual figures together: the monthly plan gives far fewer credits than the annual one. UpLead suits a buyer who wants a published price and is happy to pay annually, but not someone who wants a free plan.
| Tool | Free option | Entry paid price | Credits at entry price | Outreach built in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo.io | Free plan, no time limit | Not published | Pooled, no rollover | Check Apollo |
| Hunter | 50 credits a month | $34 a month billed yearly | 2,000 a month | Sequences with connected accounts |
| Snov.io | Trial, 50 credits | $29.25 a month billed annually | 1,000 | Recipients included |
| Lusha | 40 credits a month | $37.45 a month billed annually | 400 a month | Not covered here |
| UpLead | 7-day trial, 5 credits | $74 a month billed annually | 2,040 | Not covered here |
A founder who does their own outbound. Start on Apollo's free plan if you use Gmail, or on Hunter's free plan if you mostly need email addresses. Both give you a real test on your own prospect list before any payment.
A two-person sales team that needs phone numbers and emails. Run the same 50 target companies through Lusha's free plan, UpLead's 5-credit trial and Apollo, then compare how many contacts each returns and how many emails bounce. That test on your own list matters more than any published feature list.
A team that uses ZoomInfo for intent signals. The tools above do not replace intent data. The ZoomInfo pricing page lists intent topics by package, from 25 on Marketing Demand to unlimited on ABM Enterprise, so if that is your use, stay on ZoomInfo or look at a signal-focused vendor. If you also compare sales engagement or CRM tools, see Gong alternatives and Salesforce alternatives.
No tool here was installed or tested, and data accuracy and coverage were not measured. Apollo's pricing page showed no dollar figures for paid plans. ZoomInfo's real quotes are not public, so no ZoomInfo dollar cost is claimed. Community opinion from Reddit was not collected.
Apollo.io is the first to try. Its pricing page describes a free plan with no time limit for light use. Hunter (50 credits a month) and Lusha (40 credits a month) also have free plans. Free plans cap credits, so they suit a short prospect list, not a large database build.
Yes, with published prices. Snov.io Starter is $29.25 a month on annual billing, Hunter Starter is $34 a month billed yearly, and Lusha Starter is $37.45 a month on annual billing. ZoomInfo's pricing page shows no dollar amounts, so a direct price comparison needs a quote.
For basic prospecting, it may. Apollo's pricing page lists a free plan with no time limit, and says free-plan email campaigns can connect only Gmail accounts while paid plans also allow Microsoft Office and other providers. Its pricing page lists no intent topics, so a team that relies on ZoomInfo's intent data should test Apollo on its own prospect list first.
According to ZoomInfo's pricing page, cost depends on features, number of licenses and credit usage. Marketing Demand includes 75K credits and ABM Enterprise 150K, each export costs one credit, and the sales team works out payment frequency and options with you. The page lists no dollar amounts, so small teams usually need a quote.
UpLead offers a 7-day trial with 5 credits. Snov.io's trial plan gives 50 credits and 100 recipients, renewing every 30 days. Apollo, Hunter and Lusha have free plans instead. ZoomInfo lists a free trial on some plans and a demo on others.
Not on the plans checked. Apollo says unused credits expire at the end of the cycle and do not roll over, and Hunter says credits reset monthly and do not roll over. Buy a credit amount you will actually use in a month, not a stockpile.
Kevin Fan is a SaaS founder. He runs Free Instead Of, which tracks free and open-source alternatives to paid software and checks each price and free-plan limit against the vendor's own pages.
The official pricing pages of ZoomInfo, Apollo.io, Hunter, Snov.io, Lusha and UpLead were opened on 2026-10-26 and the figures below come from them. Two competitor roundup articles were reviewed for gaps. No Reddit threads were used, because Reddit pages were unavailable to our research tool.